BIP125 opt-in RBF discrepancy receives public security/CVE treatment
A discrepancy between BIP125's opt-in Replace-by-Fee wording and actual Bitcoin Core behavior was later assigned CVE treatment. The issue illustrated how wallet and application assumptions about replacement signaling could diverge from node-policy behavior even without creating a consensus failure.
A discrepancy between BIP125's opt-in Replace-by-Fee wording and actual Bitcoin Core behavior was later assigned CVE treatment. The issue illustrated how wallet and application assumptions about replacement signaling could diverge from node-policy behavior even without creating a consensus failure.
Useful Bitcoin security history showing assumption/implementation mismatch; limited end-user consequence.